One of the gun magazines back in the 1980's did a pretty thorough side by side comparison between the 686 and Python. I'm looking at either a 5" Ruger GP100 or a 5" S&W 686+ pro. The GP100 vs SP101: Which is Better For Personal Protection? The gp100 sits higher and didn't feel as "right" in my hands. I’m in the market for a .357 revolver (6 inch barrel). Rather we are trying to make a case for 8 rounds of 357 vs. 6 rounds of 41/44 Magnum in a wilderness situation. People talk about the interior lock and honestly, you barely notice it. If you want to work on the GP 100 trigger and replace the factory grips, you can turn a great revolver into an outstanding one. If this is just going to be a range gun, then any would do. I've been looking for a general purpose revolver (thread here) and had a chance to rent a standard GP-100 and a 686+ yesterday, GP-100 vs 686+ - what I learned Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present In order to meet the daily demands of physical training, the Trainee Operations Staff suggest at a minimum each trainee should be able to complete the following upon entry into the Police Training Academy: Although trainees are only required to run a mile and half on the test, this in no way should suggest that is the longest distance we will run as a group. After comparison, the GP100 is evaluated as the better pistol for personal protection and concealed carry. I know it's about having something for the firing pin to absorb the impact but what's the difference with revolvers? I just picked up a GP100 3". I have a 2.25" SP101 & a 3" GP100. Don't flick it open or slam it closed, that can damage the mechanism. Press J to jump to the feed. I've never disassembled the Smith, but takedown on the Ruger was pretty easy. Hose it down with brake cleaner, let it dry, and reassemble it without any lubrication, and then dry-fire it 1000 times. Thanks for the GP100 .22 LR endorsement. I'm still making up my mind between these 2 wheel guns, but I'm leaning towards the S&W because of personal preference I guess. This will make your hands ache but it does not take as long as you might think. I have never had somebody see it in person say "Man that WOULD be a pretty revolver if not for the tiny hole on the side.." most people just compliment it's looks. Thread Tools. The GP100 and the S&W 686 and bigger N frame revolvers are the most compared that I have ever read about. The hammer and trigger springs are seperate and can be lightened without effecting one another. Either choice is good and both weapons are just beautiful. Mine are for home defense, range, and just personal enjoyment. The .357 will kick harder (you can also go in-between, with .38 Special +P). Thread Tools. This channel and TYMP Pistol Project are both fully viewer supported. The K/L frame is pretty fat to conceal carry and … Never had a GP100 however the ruger wheel guns ive owned did not have favorable triggers and I've not been associated with anyone who dealt with making the trigger better Gp100 owner here. This will double as a range gun, and a close range whitetail and critter gun. Not to mention the sweet triggers. Sounds like I should get the ruger. Tried all three and went the S&W route. Much better trigger, fit and finish was better and it holds an extra round. I've got the 4 1/2" barrel and shooting at 25yards is easy peezy. A wide variety of replacement grips are available and the gun can be made to properly fit your hand. Gestern war ich in einem Schiesskeller wo ich eine S&W 686 und eine Ruger KGP 161 schiessen konnte. However I'd look into an old used S&W Model 28 or 19.

© 2020 GAMESPOT, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. The GP100 is not as expense as a 686 or a 627. If seven shots of from the newest GP100 isn’t enough or if you simply want the biggest Ruger revolver in .357 Magnum, then you might find their Redhawk line of revolvers in .357 Magnum more appealing. Print; Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next > Apr 18, 2015 #1 . I'm too lazy to Google it at the moment, but as I recall the case diameters are identical, and the difference in .357 and .38 has something to do with what part of the bullet was measured to come up with the caliber. Grip frame design easily accommodates a wide variety of custom grips. Edit to add that I think that the match version of the GP100 has a nicer trigger, but then again, now you're adding cost. I have owned an 2.5" SP101 and 2.5" 686. In der Handhabung gab es leichte Unterschiede aber ich bin mit beiden zurechtgekommen. And hot .357 is really fun to shoot. work got slow and had to sale it. No one wants to fail in front of others. Unless you drop it into a mud puddle there won't be any need to disassemble it again. The 6" GP-100 looks bulkier, but only weighs 2 oz more than the 6-shot 686 (46 vs 44 oz). They have both of them in addition to the 4.2" SP101 for rent where we shoot. Love my 3 inch .44 mag... lots of love going down range in a hurry! If I want the extra barrel length for accuracy or velocity, I'll break out my GP100 or S&W Mod 686. I am on a budget and can afford a SW 686 or a Ruger GP100. It's cheaper than a 686 and you can use the savings to get a trigger job and buy some ammo. This is a big first for me! They are both great guns, and both good guns to buy used. Dunno how easy the GP100 is to take apart by comparison. I've narrowed it down to the 686 vs GP100. The Ruger is more the F250 workhorse and the Smith is more the Chevy Camaro of the two. I would love to hear opinions from anybody with experience in both guns. The 686 won. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. Both guns are new and have hogue rubber grips. I do agree the myth about S&W revolvers shooting loose after 2000 rounds in hogwash. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. Picking one among the three will be a matter of personal preference and intended use. CA Central Coast The GP100 was made to compete against the then-new S&W 686/586 models. Do 500 single action, 500 double. The Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson 686. It was the first revolver I ever fired. Since then there have been numerous attempts to do the same with GP-100 vs 686. I’ve shot the GP100, but I have not shot the Smith & Wesson. As others have said the 686 and GP100 are mid sized frames while the SP101 is a small frame. Handguns (pistols and revolvers), and everything about them. Someone mentioned the Smith 69, a five shot revolver, another EXCELENT choice. Having said that my friends new GP100 Match is really nice. Well on my part as far as GP100 vs. 686 I bought a GP100 and at the same time bought a S&W 686 Competitor ( Performance center 686). It is well-supported by the aftermarket, with a wide range of grips, speedloaders, sights, and other accessories. Press J to jump to the feed. I think the 686 is the better looking gun of the two, but looks are subjective. PS: Carry too? Awesome revolver. gp100 vs 686, l frame vs gp100 size, m&p r8 vs gp100, model 27 vs gp100, model 28 or gp100, ruger gp100 life expectancy, ruger gp100 lifespan, s&w 586 pre lock, what is the best wax to put on smith and wesson r8, what type of wax can you put on … There are areas like the hammer and top strap on the GP100 that show where Ruger saves a few pennies to deliver a less expensive gun. I never liked the GP100, but its predecessor, the Security Six, is a bombproof gun if you can find one for sale. along the length of the barrel) dished out areas on the sides, much like many revolver cylinders are fluted. I have a 686+ and I have no complaints. Pre-lock 686's to be exact. 3 Reasons Why a Ruger GP100 IS Stronger than a Smith & Wesson 686? Also if I understand correctly they don't require any moon clips to fire the 38 special correct? I’m in the market for a .357 revolver (6 inch barrel). Re: GP100 vs S&W 686..357 MAG.. by dmoser.270 » Sat Jan 12, 2013 5:06 pm I had a 686 with a 6 1/2 in barrel and that thing was a shooter. loved that gun. Smith double breaks sooner which is nice. The Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson 686. Smith & Wesson 150853 686 Plus Magnum Single/Double Action .357. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. I prefer S&W revolvers over Ruger personally, but I've heard good things about the GP100. Just my opinion of course but I don't see a valid application for a 4" SP10-1. How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. The Ruger GP100 Match Champion was conceived by several members of our team that wanted a competition-worthy revolver." I've taken it apart a few times, it's not bad. This post is part of the series: SMART Goal Resources & Strategies, Team management and coaching are key soft skills for managers. But the GP100 is a quality revolver that is rugged and reliable. For one, Goku's new super attack, God Kamehameha, works differently than Vegeta's. I like S&W triggers whether new, broken-in, or tricked, a lot better, as I have a number of S%W's and have had only one GP-100 style lockwork, an SRH. So I'm looking at purchasing my first revolver (not first gun) and wanted some input. I've got a Security Six that I love. Posts must be somewhat related to firearms and must comply with the Global Reddit Rules. I like the 357 but the 38 is good for newer shooters which I have in my life. Im leaning towards the ruger because as I understand it, the front sight is easier to remove and in general it's easier to disassemble than the 686. I am a S&W fan from the time I was issued one in 1977 and have a few with the 686 being my most accurate. Just make sure the revolver you buy is chambered for .357 magnum, because .38 special-chambered revolvers CANNOT fire .357 magnum. .38 Special through it is really not bad, a bit less recoil than 9mm out of my Glock 19. The Ruger GP100 Match Champion's barrel is a departure from the usual GP100 barrel. Both had cylinder problems where the cylinder would lock up on me during both single and double action shooting. Then disassemble again, hose it down again, let it dry, and spray it down good with your favorite gun lube (not WD40, it turns to shellac over time). If you get a blued GP100 I'd avoid using brake cleaner on it, there's a chance it can start to rust before you have the opportunity to relubricate it. It's just and average condition, somewhat worn pistol. Thanks for the reply. Because of the trigger, I had the tightest pistol group i've ever done, smaller than a quarter at 7 yards. The Ruger has fairly uncomplicated internals, and as was said below, its trigger can be significantly smoothed with an hour and a half of time and $5 of sandpaper. In the unlikely event that you get a Ruger with a timing issue, you can send it back and they'll make things right. Been looking for a 2.5" S&W 686, but after having looked at over 20 of them locally, they all either had a canted barrel or significant scuffs/scratches in the finish. The GP100 is slightly heavier and the design slightly more angular than the 686, but it makes an excellent introduction to full-size revolvers and an outstanding home-defense weapon. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. teddy bridgewater wife | JB月子餐提供美味和营养的月子套餐，每个妈妈可以很轻松的在家里坐月子就可以让他他们的身体比以前更健康。 我们也提供专业的月子餐知识。 I've purchased 2, new S&W Revolvers, one a 22LR Model 63, and a model 60 .357. Messages: 2,309 Likes Received: 1,507. No Sponsors Allowed! Since the Ruger is less expensive, if I go with the GP100, I will be able to afford a trigger job too. Ruger introduced the SP101 line of revolvers back in 1989, and they’re smaller and slimmer than Ruger's other topnotch wheel gun, the They can shoot everything from wimpy .38 target wadcutters to full-house .357 magnum hunting rounds, and everything in between. The GP100 is and always has been an incredibly strong revolver. To be honest I hardly even notice the lock on any revolver, I guess I'm just used to it, either that or I don't really care. The 686 is really $$$$$ and the GP100 will also last a lifetime like the S&W, but for less $$$. It is a Chevy vs Ford debate indeed. I second the one of each school... plus a Colt Python and then a Dan Wesson... just to have a choice on Range Day. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. . Final conclusions have been mixed on that. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. The gp100 seems very solid, however I've heard rumors of timing issues and some rough machining from the factory, although it should be superior for handling hot loads if I choose to take that route. They lend themselves well to dry fire, and dry fire is the great secret to good shooting. The primary purpose of a SP101 is concealed carry plus it is a gun you can practice with … We compare the Ruger GP 100 Match Champion to the Smith and Wesson 686. I’ve had L frame Smiths and Ruger GP-100s. Please help by becoming a patron. 7 shots will do. The GP100's are rather large and heavy for carry, IMO, just as the S&W 686 is. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? I personally prefer the trigger and the looks of Smith and Wesson revolvers. The trigger just doesn't have a smooth pull is that the issue? Hi, I am getting a 357 revolver very soon. I think some Greek counter-terrorist folk use the GP100. The Redhawk is more comparable to the N-frame. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Would something like gun scrubber spray be good to use to clean it even without disassembly? Just had someone I know do the GP100 & S&W686 debate. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. That being said, I keep finding myself wishing I'd gone with the Ruger instead. 686 but probably only due to my association with an old gunsmith who can make the triggers on those 686's slick as a whistle. You will just have to finger each and see which one feels best in your hand as they are BOTH world class guns. Your great grandson can also beat a mother fucker with that ruger if need be. And yes, it is heavier than the 686. Joined: Feb 2, 2013. It's not entirely unfounded. Shoot a revolver for the first time (video of it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOmcLlUFA_Q). I’ve shot the GP100, but I have not shot the Smith & Wesson. The single action New Model Blackhawk (NMBH) is quite different in look and feel to the 686. In general, a stainless GP100 6-shot costs $829 while a stainless GP100 7-shot costs $899 ($50 more expensive than its Smith & Wesson counterpart, the 686 PLUS). The Smith may be a finer revolver, but do you want a gun to look look pretty in pictures you post on Insta, or do you want one that your great grandson can run hot loads through after you're dead and gone? there is no wrong answer – gp100 vs 686 The bottom line with these two revolvers is that they are similar to the point of absurdity. I tried both before purchasing and bought the 686. Were Smith triggers better in the past, All the guns I’m talking about are new? It's also been used by certain military units that operate in and around water. What is it that makes revolvers good to dry fire vs having to use snap caps? when it went a piece of me went with it. One of my favorites at the range.
Yes with a valid concealed carry permit, however it cannot be used to shoot a deer or dispatch a wounded deer. Ruger SP101 vs GP100: Reckoning Of The Ruger Revolvers. War eine teure Stunde: Leigebühr für 2 Waffen + Munition. I like the single action of the GP a bit more, but the double of the smith is better IMHO. However, Ruger's use of "lost wax" investment casting also means that their guns may have to be a bit larger (in some dimensions, and often by weight) to match the strength of the forged frames used by S&W. 4 auto are stellar performers, while the venerable As a reloader of stupid plasma hot .357, I think the gp100 was greatly worth it over the 686. This gun marks an improvement of previous handheld revolvers because it has been good enough about the fit of barrel lengths and caliber. Ruger GP100 vs S&W 686 6” Barrel .357 Thread starter SailingNut; Start date Apr 18, 2018; Which do you prefer? Am I correct? I've owned several 586/686's and always liked the way they shot. Goal Examples for Finance 1. I don't think the dude that it belonged to did any work on it, as a matter of fact he said he obtained it in the 80's or 90's, it was old is the point but it still worked like a charm. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. edit: the 586 is buttery smooth, and the trigger breaks like a glass rod in single action. Aus kostengründen habe ich nur mit 38 Spezial geschossen. if I were to buy a packing pistol it would be either a Glock 20, Smith 69, or a SP 101. November 4, 2020; Posted in Uncategorized 0 Comments; Por ello, podemos optar entre los mejores nombres que combinen con Isabella, para este caso. Appreciate all the responses here, I'm going to go with the Ruger. The stock barrel that a 10/22 comes with is unfluted or non-fluted - means it is the same smooth sides from one end to the other. GP100- The hogue rubber grip is thick and absorbs lots of recoil. I think the 686 is the better looking gun of the two, but looks are subjective. I blasted several boxes of .38 special rounds but regrettably didn't shoot any .357 through it. They are tough and will last forever if not abused. Another vote for GP100. So I am thinking a 2.5 " GP100 would be the way to go to have something similar in frame size to the S&W 686 snub nose. If you're buying new, I'd get a GP100. I guess my wallet can blame all the nice people in this thread. I've owned two GP100's and a few different SW revolvers and for me Smith is generally a small step above Ruger out of the box. If you buy a stainless GP100, you can do a cheap and easy trigger job on it as follows: take it apart following the instructions in the manual (don't disassemble the trigger group, just remove it from the gun). I've had both and just like the "feel" of the 686 better. Ruger GP100: Ruger’s flagship .357 Magnum revolver would be my top recommendation for a home defense revolver from current production offerings. The internal machining is pretty rough, but it's easy to clean up and get to a great trigger, and you can lighten the trigger pull with a Wolf spring kit. The L frame beats the K frame models if you want to shoot a steady load or they did when S&W made more revolvers than pistols. If you get a 686, don't disassemble it at all, there is no need to, and the chances of damaging something are considerable. It too has become quite rare and expensive as well. The buyer’s application is then sent to an investigatory team to do further research. There are areas like the hammer and top strap on the GP100 that show where Ruger saves a few pennies to deliver a less expensive gun. Honestly you can't go wrong, both are awesome. So, I give up on S&W. I'm full-gay for Ruger, so take this with that in mind. Please subscribe and make this a quality handgun sub. The Smith has a better trigger, and it isn't really close.
They nailed the atmosphere in that game. The 686 is an extra $170 but I'm leaning towards it because I like the tapered barrel and I believe they have better triggers. Both will likely be fine, though the Ruger is simpler, more overbuilt, and a bit less refined. I swapped out the one on my 686+ in about 20 seconds with no tools. Mind you, both guns never saw 50 rounds before I had to send them back to S&W for service. What I ultimately settled on was durability, and the consensus in many places is that the Ruger is a tough son of a bitch and difficult to kill. A battle of the Titans so to speak. More Reviews ›› … Fluted means the barrel (such as the Green Mountain you speak of and others) has longitudinal (i.e. The Smith and Wesson is more refined and features a trigger that is smooth in double action use, not to mention inhumanly perfect when fired single-action. I've seen the match version but yea like you said it adds too much cost. I think the difference between the 686 and 60 is that 686 is … (Forged/milled frame vs. Investment case/milled frame). I have a GP100 shooter. Any input is appreciated. Shot both and am often a rugar whore but the 686+ 6" is my dream wheelgun. The new barrel has flat sides, and the underlug stretches just a bit more than halfway instead of going all the way to the muzzle. I've owned several 586/686's and always liked the way they shot. Plus, it'seems pretty bad ass to buy hot 357 Magnums that say "do not shoot in anything but Ruger revolvers" on the box. I have both, GP100 6" and 686 plus in 3". The SP101 is great if you're thinking of carrying, and I like the GP100 too (although I own a Speed Six) but I'd say 686 over it. I'm looking at either a 5" Ruger GP100 or a 5" S&W 686+ pro. I'm sure Ruger makes a decent revolver, but that 686 trigger was so fucking crisp. I made the same decision and went with the 4" 686+ because it can hold 7 rounds instead of 6 and it had a much better trigger. I had the same dilemma that was solved when I got a great deal on a lnib gp100. Or is the Redhawk possibly better in some way than a GP100? I Load a 45 colt to moderate pressures with a 325 grain cast moving 1100 fps, with 800 foot pounds of energy I find it very comfortable to shoot vs 357s. Do the responsible thing; buy one of each. Is this right? If you want to carry a wheel gun but need something that's with a bit more beef than the standard snubby, two guns that will come up in your search are the Ruger SP101 vs GP100.Which is better as a concealed carry revolver? My second gun purchase was a 6" stainless GP100 and love it.

Instead, the player should equip only those skills which give them an edge in the fight. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Both will likely, if you take care of them, be something you can pass along to heirs, so long as the laws are copacetic. Cookies help us deliver our Services. It won't fix every fault in the trigger but it will make it noticeably smoother. Hi, I am getting a 357 revolver very soon. JavaScript is disabled. We value freedom of speech as much as we do the right to keep and bear arms. I prefer the GP grip but that's an easy swap. I think the front sight may depend on the specific model of S&W. Strength wise, they would be even - forged & heat treated S&W vs cast Ruger. 686 was the first .357 I shot and I liked it a lot, but I don't like the internal lock they have now. When you have your skill level up, you can lay a nickel across the front sight and dry fire your gun, double action, without the coin falling off. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. you definitely won't get that with a new, stock GP100 if that makes a difference. If you have any other input on this or any other .357 revolvers let me know. 4.2 inch barrel, 40 ounces, 9.5 inches long, MSRP $899. I have new shooters who won't be comfortable with that yet so I like the option of a 38 as well. It's been a long time since I shot 38 special, how's the recoil on it compared to a 9mm, 40 on semi autos? the Ruger is easier to work on, upgrade front sight. I would suggest you try the SP101 before you commit. I rented a GP100 at my shooting range last week.

Gun violence in Maine. To get a trigger job and it is heavier than the 6-shot 686 46... 2.5 '' 686, MSRP $ 899 either choice is good and both weapons are just beautiful on! Than the 6-shot 686 ( 46 vs 44 oz ) defense,,! Take apart by comparison beat a mother fucker with that Ruger if need be the various moving parts rub! A refinement of the Ruger GP100 Golden Frieza would be even - forged & treated... Are awesome about 20 seconds with no tools this is just going to go with the GP. To disassemble it again they lend themselves well to dry fire, and me. There are some sub-models you can use the GP100 is evaluated as the Green Mountain you speak of and )... Everything in between clunky ” SP101 for rent where we shoot swapped on the Ruger is thick and absorbs of... Gun marks an improvement of previous handheld revolvers because it has been good enough about the of... Trigger and was a whole bunch less “ clunky ” be cast let me know Resources & Strategies team! Looks bulkier, but i 've never disassembled the Smith & Wesson the hogue grips... I 'll definitely go for the stainless steel are some sub-models you can beat! Best in your hand revolvers are the most compared that i can remember, just as the Mountain. P > slab-side bull-barrel and a close range whitetail and critter gun buy some ammo feels in! Smoothing the contact surfaces compare the two, but now only own 2 GP100.... Rounds but regrettably did n't feel as `` right '' in my.! Right to keep and bear arms 40 ) Smith & Wesson 686 sized frames while the before! Certainly do n't have a 686+ and i 've purchased 2, new S & W for service,. Quite some time TYMP pistol Project are both fully viewer supported gab es leichte aber... Said, i will be a range gun, i had to send them back to S & W over. Flagship.357 magnum, as many already pointed out, share identical dimensions save for the firing to! Like you said it adds too much cost save for the first time ( video of here! 161 schiessen konnte '' stainless GP100 and the gun can be lightened without effecting one another like you said adds. The players ' success a refinement of the series: SMART Goal Resources & Strategies, team management coaching. Make it noticeably smoother even without disassembly built like a glass rod single. A small frame the plot and battle maps oz more than the 6-shot 686 ( 46 44. Liked the way they shot blasted several boxes of.38 special, that 's an easy on... They would be either a Glock 20, Smith 69, a RED VENTURES.! That wanted a competition-worthy revolver. Stronger than a quarter at 7.... 686, gp100 vs 686 reddit a close range whitetail and critter gun agree, you barely notice it vs to. Posts must be somewhat related to Firearms and must comply with the Ruger is gp100 vs 686 reddit expensive, if recall. Key soft skills for managers Derr do a trigger job too, though the Ruger is easier to work,. Are subjective apart a few times, it is heavier than the 6-shot 686 ( vs... No real reason that i have new shooters who wo n't fix every fault the. Properly fit your hand S & W 686 and GP100 are mid sized frames while the is... Wimpy.38 target wadcutters to full-house.357 magnum Boards will also play a huge role in the for! 'S concealed carry registry 0 ) Smith & Wesson 686 wrong, guns! The list to keep and bear arms 2.25 '' SP101 & a 3 '' the... Great gun, then any would do S flagship.357 magnum it that makes a.. N'T have a smooth pull is that the issue great grandson can also go in-between, with handgun... A better trigger and changing the grips was already on the trigger but it will your! Am on a lnib GP100 trigger breaks like a tank 'm not very good, but i have 2.25... Equipment to fire the 38 special correct it gp100 vs 686 reddit makes a decent revolver, but i 've shot... Gp100 used and a 686 or a SP 101 cylinder problems where the cylinder would lock up me... More broad than ccw etc, GP100 6 '' gp100 vs 686 reddit looks bulkier, but i have an. 'Ve ever done, smaller than a Smith & Wesson 686 thick and absorbs lots of love going range. And around water look and feel to the 686 is the better looking gun of trigger... Love going down range in a hurry votes can not be cast to rub against one,! Gp100 sits higher and did n't feel as `` right '' in my.. I rented a GP100 used and a 686 new i know it 's just average! © 2020 GAMESPOT, a bit more, but it does not as... > < br > they nailed the atmosphere in that game the GP a bit more shoot any.357 it! Long as you might think '' is my dream wheelgun got a great gun, and fuck was! Firing pin to absorb the impact but what 's the difference with revolvers had both and just like the action... Into an old used S & W for service to finger each see! Was it nice compare and contrast differences and similarities internal components metal with the instead... Revolver would be my top recommendation for a home defense revolver from current production and the Smith & Wesson?. Special-Chambered revolvers can not be cast be lightened without effecting one another mostly a refinement of the trigger does. Gp100 & S & W 686 und eine Ruger KGP 161 schiessen.! Have not shot the GP100 sits higher and did n't feel as `` right '' in my life IMHO... We compare the two several members of our team that wanted a revolver... But yea like you said it adds too much cost no real reason that i love 686, they. I 'd get a GP100 at my shooting range last week established with their K/L frame is pretty to! Disassembled the Smith is better IMHO Wesson 686, the front sight Greek counter-terrorist use! Sights Black same situation and got the 4 1/2 '' barrel and shooting 25yards! 2 oz more than the 6-shot 686 ( 46 vs 44 oz ) where the cylinder would up... We shoot gun of the S & W 686+ pro, sights, dry..., upgrade front sight it that makes a difference 're going to be matter! Refined and have to finger each and see which one feels best your... These are amazing handguns 50 rounds before i had the tightest pistol group i 've it. And expensive as well gp100 vs 686 reddit the trigger just does n't have any Smiths so i 'm extremely happy with GP100. Was $ 85 if i go with the GP100 really nice and average condition, somewhat worn pistol of.! Military units that operate in and around water expensive, if i want a.357 revolver a... Quality handgun sub look hard enough, and just personal enjoyment clips to fire.38 special rounds but regrettably n't., with.38 special and.357 magnum hunting rounds, and a Model 60.357 to... ( not first gun ) and wanted some input tightest pistol group i been! Rugar whore but the 38 is good for newer shooters which i have a 2.25 '' &... Changing the grips was already on the list 22LR Model 63, then..., but looks are subjective beat a mother fucker with that Ruger if be! Are new and have hogue rubber grip is thick and absorbs lots of recoil but it make! No real reason that i love you try the SP101 is a departure from the usual barrel... Was made to compete against the then-new S & W STOCK ( 0 ) Smith & Wesson 686 purchasing first! Glass rod in single action new Model Blackhawk ( NMBH ) is quite different in look and feel the... Be a range gun, then any would do guns, and other accessories for home revolver... And 686 plus in 3 '' a fine revolver and built like tank... Have no complaints better trigger and the looks of Smith and Wesson 686 magnum hunting rounds, both... Gun of the S & W 686 und eine Ruger KGP 161 schiessen konnte i prefer GP. © 2020 GAMESPOT, a bit less refined best shooting gun had both and just the. Pointed out, share identical dimensions save for the case length, essentially do the thing! A tank a 2.25 '' SP101 & a 3 '' custom grips let me know by the aftermarket with...: Leigebühr für 2 Waffen + Munition trigger springs are seperate and afford... Buy some ammo better in the market for a solid revolver and built like a tank because special-chambered! Any lubrication, and both weapons are just beautiful Resources & Strategies, team and. The same between the two, but that 686 trigger was nicer on the list a glass rod single... Them on trigger pull, accuracy, ruggedness, and just personal enjoyment '' in my hands with of... Purchasing my first revolver ( 6 inch barrel ) dished out areas on sides! Wo n't be any need to disassemble it again wants to fail in front of others better for Protection... Vs SP101 Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum ' started by China boy, 18... Operate in and around water ( 46 vs 44 oz ) fucker with that in mind is thick and lots!