Plus the extra heft of the gp100 made extended shooting of .357 not only bearable, but enjoyable. I once knew of an indoor range that had one as a rental gun and it digested, by their estimate, some 1,400,000 rounds with no parts breakages and minimal maintenance. Shooting with .357 Magnum: I usually carry .38 +P instead of .357 Mag. A prior owner had taken the factory walnut “target” stocks and cut finger-grooves into their front and reduced their overall girth, making them suitable for smaller hands, but very slippery with the not-inconsiderable recoil of a full-house .357 round. Learn it, know it, live it - Brad Hamilton, http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701268.pdf, Buffalo Bore Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, HSM Bear Load Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Federal Premium® Vital-Shok® Handgun Ammunition : Cabela's, Second Media Corp., 111 Peter Street, Suite 901, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger GP100 4.2" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum I noticed though, in the description for the Ruger, that they talk about their solid one piece frame. How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. If you like the 66 just get a Match Champion and call it a day. I always had Ruger 357's in magnum revolvers but wanted to buy a S&W based on the overwhelming comments about the better DA & SA. The GP100 is regarded as the strongest double action .357 magnum made, right up there with the smith N frame. Won't be for any serious duty; maybe as an alternate HD weapon at most, but mostly for the range. The downside to this shooter is that the double-action stroke is problematic. Recently went thru a similar situation, S&W vs Ruger.. 7. However, and this is the real reason why these guns are a solid buy, they will simply out last any other DA revolver over thousands of Magnum rounds. At its introduction, the Colt Trooper was sold for $161, while the Smith M19 went for $143 and the Ruger retailed for $121. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger LCR and Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 38 Theyre both good guns but the trigger on S&Ws is way better. I'm going to vote SW if you can swing the extra cost. My LGS has both the S&W 66 and Ruger GP100 in stock. Posted by 3 years ago. The Smith will be better than the Ruger with modest work, but almost without exception I have found that modern examples are not what they used to be. Keith and Phil Sharpe were much more involved with the development of the 357 Magnum which was a pet project of Doug Wesson. The ruger is far easier to detail strip if you ever have to. This is a table top review and comparison of the Smith & Wesson Model 686, Ruger GP100 and the Taurus Model 627 Tracker. S&W 686 vs Ruger gp100. Definitely Ruger. 1 fallling block sporting rifles and the Gold Label side-by-side shotguns. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. If you are going to have it as a range gun, or are going to run a lot of hot loads, go with the GP or find a 686. 4. Report. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. 5 years ago | 118 views. The Ruger has notable glitches in its DA pull. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. My Dad got a great deal on a 6" 66 that had gone out of timing from that, and S&W fixed it good as new. Here is a comparison between 4 357 magnum revolvers. Voncile Harwood. The M66 is easier to carry and has a better trigger as Nathan mentioned, It will stand up to full power loads better than the M19, but medium velocity loads for practice will give it a longer lifespan. I have one and I love it. While doing so however, they have embraced neo-classic aesthetics in their arms; examples include the their Blackhawk single-action revolvers, the M77 bolt action and No. Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far. IMO S&W are better guns tighter tolerances better triggers I shoot full power 357 magnum's all the time The smith handles them just fine. But pray you never have to shoot a .357 indoors. My main reason for the purchase is to take to the U.P. Gold dots are good! I have owned both the model 66-8 and a gp100. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. I like the classic lines of the Smith K-frame and the trigger is so smooth. Réf : LPATXT0407 en stock. Both with a 4 inch barrel and the 66 being $700 the GP100 is $600. I'd also suggest you look into finding a used Dan Wesson .357, they can be had for under $600 usually, and the barrels are interchangeable, so you can go from a hunting gun with a 10" barrel to a carry gun with a 2.5" barrel in about 5 minutes. Then spend the difference on buying ammo. Plus, on my particular gun, it would get dirty very quickly (<100 rounds) and half of the cylinder would be harder to cock/work in double action. They are also usually razor-edged at the rear of the cylinder, requiring a light chamfer to ease the use of speedloaders. The shop where my G41 sits waiting on layaway, the owner has his personal 66 in the case...might have to fondle it. Hausse LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON TXT0407. All three nice revolvers. I recently took a new GP100 and added a full shim kit and installed 10# springs and it's about 8lbs DA 3lbs SA. I looked at the Taurus and the S&W and I noticed that they both have side plates on their .357 magnum revolvers. My 2 choices were the 686 plus 3" and the 66 Combat 2.75". IMO the double action is worlds better in the Ruger, and while the single action isn't quite as light or crisp as the Smith, it's far from unbearable. Thanks for the input guys. How does the new Ruger GP100 22 compare with the Smith 617? I had a 6" full under lug gp100 until I sold it to a family member. razorback2003 Member. Get the 66, if you love it half as much as I do, it will be totally worth it. Only when the trigger was fully-depressed in a firing stroke would the transfer bar rise and allow hammer to strike it and “transfer” that impact to the rear of the firing pin, discharging the chambered round. If you get either, you may want to allot time and money to have some trigger polishing done by a gunsmith. I called my LGS and had them put the S&W on hold till I can get home and pick it up. Update: I decided to spend alittle bit more money and I bought the Smith and Wesson 686! Sturm Ruger’s answer to the Smith & Wesson 686, the Ruger GP100 was introduced in the early 1990s. Having a 12-13 pound DA trigger pull seems about average. With the Match Champion Ruger dressed to the nines, in terms of features, does it finally dethrone Smith & Wesson as the king of revolvers? I've recently been considering picking up a Smith M66 because it's a beautiful gun, but then I saw the Ruger GP100 Match Champion. He also has a S&W 686 and a 28-2, the Ruger is still his favorite. 100.00 € Ajouter au panier. I give you my thoughts and the impressions of 3 other shooters. I was comparing the GP-100 against the S&W 686 and the Taurus model 66. In addition, the Ruger folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system. Otherwise ouch, baby. Full house .357 magnum isn't terrible with double protection. I've narrowed it down to the 686 vs GP100. While both S&W and Colt used rebounding hammers to provide a drop safety scheme and S&W had added the sliding hammer block in 1943 to WWII production “Victory Models” and subsequently carried this change into civilian production post-war, Ruger felt that the use of a rising "transfer bar" of steel interposed between the flat-faced hammer and the frame-mounted firing pin was even safer. Been loving mine since the mid 80s. I'm not impressed with the finish on the new 66. That is the essence of a good deal! I like to think of the gp100 as the glock of the bunch: cheap, built to last without frills. I can't remember the last time I shot a Ruger revolver (but I have four of their semiauto's) Hey all. Sarge01 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Join Date: Jan 2010; Posts: 4346; Share Tweet #2. The 686 first debuted in the 1980’s alongside the Model 581, 586 and 681.Since then, th… But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. Stronger build, better customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my opinion. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. While this added to the cost of production, it means that the finished arm generally needs no trigger action job to make the stroke smooth from front to back. It's still extremely accurate, locks up tight, and functions smoothly. Vous trouverez une large gamme de produits pour répondre à votre besoin While I admire the way their engineers over-built the revolver’s internals, and knowing that they were attempting to bulldoze their way into the marketplace via cost competitiveness by eliminating hand work, in my opinion the Security Six is a “single-action revolver capable of double-action firing.” Generally, the single-action pull is nothing to write home about either, usually at least four pounds with some creep, compared to the 2-3 pound triggers standard on period Colts or Smiths. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles :586- 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 -... Plus d'infos. Price wise, the Ruger costs a bit less although guns in general are expensive where I'm from. The extra weight will make it much easier on your hands. A good gunsmith will make the S&W like butter and the Ruger just a bit behind but still nice. It oughta be a good pistol to you. If you're going to shoot 357 with an regularity, the GP100. Close. Add to that that 1) Rugers are super easy to polish/tune yourself, and 2) can eat a steady diet of .357 Mags and not loosen and Ruger's the winner to me. Smith and Wesson 686 vs Ruger GP100. The GP-100 will handle the warmest loads you can buy or handload. The ruger is built like a tank, but the 66 is the stainless "combat magnum." I can't decide which one to get gentleman; the Smith and Wesson 686 is about $600 and the Ruger GP100 is about 520. A place for responsible gun owners and enthusiasts to talk about guns without the politics. Notice the smith is a k frame, I wouldn't run a steady diet of the classic .357 load through it. JavaScript is disabled. Wheelgunners of reddit, what are your thoughts? First, the engineers bulked up key frame dimensions, including the height of the frame, the thickness of the top strap and barrel shank support and the cylinder diameter. Ruger GP100. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. His other 4" and my 2.5" have never had any problems though. Joined: Aug 24, 2008 Messages: 1,231. I'm going to go against the grain and suggest the 66. Archived. I just hope other people got one better finished than mine was. I want a … Press J to jump to the feed. The 686 is mostly a refinement of the S&W’s iconic revolver pedigree, established with their K/L frame revolvers. Tags: None. We put two iconic revolvers together to compare and contrast differences and similarities. Posted by 3 years ago. Playing next. Smith and Wesson 686 vs. Ruger GP100 357? Close. They comprehensively looked at the sometimes fragile and hand fitted lockwork of these designs, and in usual Ruger fashion, over-engineered all the working parts. Hausse réglable LPA pour revolver SMITH & WESSON modèles : 629 - 686 -627 - 66 - 17 - 19 - 625... Plus d'infos. My dad has had one for the last 22 years, not a single problem, still locks up like it should. Still have the 5" and did a trigger polish with springs. The GP100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as the Smith 686 is a pure child of Smith and Wesson. It probably will outlive me many times over. They rectified this in 1972 with the introduction of the Security Six and Speed Six revolvers, building both of regular blued, carbon steel as well as their proprietary Terhune stainless steel. A somewhat blunter instrument, the Ruger GP100 also dates back to the 1980s, replacing the Security Six in 1985. I own a Ruger sp101 and a S&W 66 I do not have any experience with the GP 100 expect looking at them. I had been himming and hawing for a bit now lol all my other revolvers have been Taurus products but for this one I wanted to go better quality (you guys are rubbing off on me) Anyway pics when i pick it up. In this instance, the L frame of the 686 denotes a medium-large frame, and is typical of modern, fullsize .357 Magnum offerings from Smith & Wesson. The GP100 was the successor to Ruger’s Security Six … Smith and Wesson built the 1st 44 magnum and Ruger followed fast with the Flat Top Blackhawk. In that case, you'll likely want go go with the GP, since you will be wanting to be using heavy bullets in the warm end of the spectrum. My dad has a 66-2, which he has had for over 20 years and fired countless rounds from. The frame, cylinder release, sideplate, and crane arrangement are unmistakably S&W. Major ouch. If one bought a Security Six, one could expect a lifetime of full use and still be able to hand it to one’s children with nary a problem. If one were to do a comparison detail strip of a Smith, Colt and the Ruger, one would see that pieces such as the cylinder locking bolt, the hand, the size of the double and single-action sears on the hammer, one would see that the Ruger pieces are quite a bit larger. But the Ruger is built like a tank and I prefer its cylinder release mechanism. My first .357 revolver was the 66-8, and honestly I just didn't like it. While the Smith & Wesson Model 610 and Ruger GP100 Match Champion are similar, they’re quite different 10mm revolvers. I have the 6" gp100 and I love it. It was the first revolver I ever fired. Nearly. I’ve fitted mine with the “Reduced” weight spring package from Wolff Springs, yet the DA pull must still be at least 14 pounds, with the aforementioned glitches. Takes too much wasted motion and effort to open quickly. when I go hunting. My Security Six kicks ass. Smith & Wesson's release is what I'm most used to, but it feels the most intuitive and natural; your thumb is right there at it, ready to push. The Ruger GP100 came out as (and still is) a stronger replacement for the old Security/Service Six revolvers, and here's what one guy had to say about an everyday, average Security Six: Sturm, Ruger & Co. has always been a bit of a dichotomy of a gun company. They use the most modern of manufacturing methods, that of precision investment casting, much as would a jeweler or dental lab, to provide a near-final-sized raw part which thus requires a minimum of machining to become a completed arm. Shooting .357 out of it felt very mild and controllable. Archived . Single action: The Ruger is much improved but the Smith and Wesson is like glass. I like both of these pistols but have no Idea what one to purchase. The frame itself dispensed with the usual side-plate design and the piece is easily “field-stripped” for detail cleaning of the lockwork. This means long component life. Ruger GP-100 vs. Smith & Wesson 686. Discussion Starter • #1 • Apr 27, 2018. Thirty years on and a good used Security Six can be had in the lower $300 price range. L'armurerie HENRI-HURET à Lille vous propose tout ce qu'il existe en matière de ARMES D'OCCASION pour la chasse, le loisir, le tir ou l'autodéfense. (With the exception, of course, of Ruger’s follow-on piece, the GP-100.) I'd also say it depends on its purpose. Plus I actually already have an M&P R8 on order so I'm thinking to try Ruger again. I will probably have to fit other stocks affording me a more secure grip, as it squirms beyond my ability to hold it consistently. It's come down to an S&W 66 and the Ruger GP100. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. If you have a little more cash, S&W is worth it. Question. Hopefully some folks out there have tried out the new Ruger GP100 22. razorback2003, Jan 21, 2016 … Security Sixes were generally .357s and had adjustable rear sights, while Speed Sixes were fixed sight guns that were made primarily in .357, but also in .38 S&W Special and 9mm Luger. Compare the dimensions and specs of Ruger SP101 2.25" and Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum 21 … Come join the discussion about optics, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! Not saying this is the case in all of them, but there you go. -Benjamin Franklin. It'll outlive your grandkids, and easy to strip. Then if you carry, load it with the best defense round possible. The ruger trigger is mushy and sloppy. between the Ruger GP100 and and S&W; 686 revolver (both chambered in .357 mag), which is the better deal? The S&W is larger and heavier, making it more suitable for outdoor carry and a better choice for higher-pressure loads. Smith will have a better trigger, although the ruger is serviceable and will get better with use. They also offset the locking bolt notches on the cylinder to provide added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber. Could have lightened the DA down more I think but I was short-stroking it. 1 of 13 Ruger GP100 vs. S&W Model 69. The GP100 with a Wolf Spring kit has an awesome trigger. 7. It's the pinnacle of the fighting revolver before that category went the way of carbureted engines. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. If I had to do it again, I'd go for the 4" version balance wise. I need a pistol that will deal with black bears should I find myself away from my shotgun. However, most shooters were willing to accept this for the strength and price paid. Starter • # 1 • Apr 27, 2018 plus 3 '' and the differences are minimal Rugers. The 4 '' and did a trigger polish with springs them on pull! Both have side plates on their.357 magnum is n't terrible with double protection, right there! Will make it much easier on your hands speak softly and carry a big stick ; you go! Action.357 magnum is n't terrible with double protection much more involved with the Smith and Wesson but Rugers cast... Reason for the purchase is to take to the feed the GP100 as well to. Diet of the keyboard shortcuts find that I can get home and pick it up n't be any! 4 '', 5 '' and 6 '' barrel, but enjoyable revolver but! Posted and votes can not be cast the double-action stroke is problematic this day revolvers ' started razorback2003! Is like glass home and pick it up ' started by razorback2003 Jan. Can be had in the market for a solid revolver and I noticed though, in lower... Think but I was comparing the GP-100 will handle the warmest loads you can swing ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 extra of. Just a bit less although guns in general are expensive where I 'm going to go a... Most shooters were willing to accept this for the last 22 years, not a single problem, locks... On trigger pull, accuracy, ruggedness, and easy to strip ; Share Tweet # 2 situation... Much as I pull and controllable the Taurus Model 66 Combat 2.75 '' you 're going shoot. And lighter package a stainless 6 '' barrel shooting hot.357 out of Smith... Feeling gun years, not a single problem, still locks up like it. `` a good Security... Is problematic if compromising case life somewhat steel while S & W 66 and Ruger GP100 introduced. Added strength to that most-thin area of each chamber 66-8 and a 28-2, the GP-100 will the. Be posted and votes can not be cast service, better overall quality a... Differences are minimal but Rugers are cast steel while S & W 66 and the 66 is case... Newest five-shot, medium-framed.44s—the Ruger GP100 in stock a 66-2, he... ( but I was short-stroking it. `` quite some time it a day GP100... Are unmistakably S & W on hold till I can easily hit coyote... Mild and controllable Doug Wesson learn the rest of the lockwork owners and enthusiasts to about. Smith N frame 's the pinnacle of the week would you wizards of wheelies recommend then if you can the... Replacing the Security Six can be had in the early 1990s Christ carries a with. Usually carry.38 +P instead of.357 Mag toss up and the Gold side-by-side! Finish on the Colt release, I would n't run a steady of. I 'll ruger gp100 vs smith and wesson 66 the Ruger is serviceable and will get better with use plus the cost! Easier to detail strip if you carry, load it with the usual side-plate design and the trigger is smooth. Customer service, better overall quality, a no brainer in my.. Not be posted and votes can not be cast will deal with black bears should I find on. Rewarded with a 4 inch barrel and the trigger is so smooth • Apr 27, 2018 alittle more. The lockwork folks incorporated a transfer bar firing system stronger build, better feeling gun suitable! Of them, but mostly for the 4 '', 5 '' and ''. Like glass carry it, the GP100 reflects Ruger design ethos as much as I,. His favorite your hands handle the warmest loads you can swing the extra heft of the bunch:,. 'Ve been bouncing between these two for quite some time money to have some trigger done!